Detailed curriculum

Eight weeks. One connected research workflow.

The curriculum follows the natural sequence of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expand any week to see the complete set of topics drawn from the ESMP program prospectus.

Week 1Introduction, Topic Selection & FeasibilityEstablish the foundations of evidence synthesis and develop a focused, feasible review question.

Topics covered

  • Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Differences between narrative review, systematic review, and meta-analysis
  • Overview of the PRISMA 2020 guidelines
  • Introduction to the Cochrane Handbook
  • Understanding the PICO and PECO frameworks
  • PICO formulation and topic selection
  • Topic-feasibility assessment
  • Assessing topic novelty using the available literature
  • What to do when a meta-analysis already exists for a PICO
  • When an updated meta-analysis may be appropriate
Week 2Eligibility Criteria, Search Strategy & Study ProtocolTranslate the review question into defensible eligibility criteria, a reproducible search, and a study protocol.

Topics covered

  • Defining inclusion and exclusion criteria
  • Understanding relevant study designs
  • Selecting databases for the literature search
  • Developing search terms using keywords and MeSH terms
  • Using Boolean operators: AND, OR, and NOT
  • Developing a structured search strategy
  • Adapting the search strategy for different databases
  • Introduction to systematic-review protocol writing
  • Components of a protocol
  • Introduction to PROSPERO
  • PROSPERO registration
Week 3Literature Search & ScreeningRun the search, manage records, apply eligibility criteria, and document the study-selection process.

Topics covered

  • Running the final search strategy across databases
  • Exporting search results from databases
  • Introduction to screening tools such as Rayyan
  • Duplicate removal
  • Title and abstract screening
  • Full-text screening and eligibility assessment
  • Resolving conflicts in screening
  • Handling studies with combined populations or outcomes
  • Documenting reasons for exclusion
  • Finalizing the included studies
  • Preparing the PRISMA flow diagram
Week 4Data Extraction & Quality AssessmentBuild a reliable extraction workflow and assess study quality or risk of bias with an appropriate tool.

Topics covered

  • Creating a standardized data-extraction sheet
  • Extracting study characteristics
  • Extracting baseline participant characteristics
  • Identifying useful baseline data for subgroup analysis
  • Extracting outcome data
  • Data interconversions
  • Understanding dichotomous, continuous, and effect-size outcomes
  • Handling missing or unclear data
  • Cross-checking extracted data for accuracy
  • Introduction to risk-of-bias and quality assessment
  • Selecting the appropriate quality-assessment tool
  • Presenting quality-assessment results in tables and figures
Week 5Meta-Analysis in R / RevManPrepare analysis-ready data, run and interpret meta-analyses, and produce publication-quality figures.

Topics covered

  • Introduction to R for meta-analysis
  • R compared with RevMan
  • Introduction to variables, functions, and packages in R
  • Required R packages for meta-analysis
  • Preparing the analysis sheet for R
  • Importing data into R
  • Meta-analysis of binary outcomes
  • Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes
  • Meta-analysis of effect sizes
  • Generating and interpreting forest plots
  • Fixed-effect and random-effects models
  • Methods for pooling in meta-analysis
  • Methods for estimating heterogeneity
  • Interpreting and addressing heterogeneity
  • Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis
  • Subgroup analysis
  • Publication bias
  • Egger's test for detecting publication bias
  • Trim-and-fill analysis, where applicable
  • Exporting high-quality figures for the manuscript
  • Meta-analysis in RevMan, where appropriate
Week 6GRADE Assessment & Manuscript WritingInterpret the synthesis responsibly, assess certainty, and convert the methods and results into manuscript sections.

Topics covered

  • Interpreting meta-analysis results
  • Understanding clinical and statistical significance
  • Introduction to GRADE and certainty of evidence
  • Writing the Methods section
  • Writing the Results section
  • Reporting forest plots, pooled estimates, and heterogeneity
  • Reporting sensitivity and subgroup analyses and publication bias
  • Preparing manuscript-ready tables and figures
  • Preparing supplementary files
Week 7Manuscript Writing & FormattingComplete the remaining manuscript sections and assemble a clear, internally consistent submission draft.

Topics covered

  • Writing the Introduction section
  • Writing the Discussion section
  • Interpreting findings in the context of existing literature
  • Discussing strengths, limitations, and clinical implications
  • Writing the Conclusion section
  • Preparing the abstract and title page
  • Structuring and formatting the manuscript in Microsoft Word
  • Reference management and citation formatting
  • Introduction to reference-management tools such as Mendeley and Zotero
Week 8Finalization & SubmissionReview the complete submission package, choose a suitable journal, and understand the submission process.

Topics covered

  • Final manuscript review and editing
  • Finalizing manuscript tables, figures, and supplementary files
  • Completing the PRISMA 2020 checklist
  • Understanding journals and publishers
  • Closed-access and open-access journals
  • Choosing an appropriate journal and publisher
  • Avoiding predatory journals and publication scams
  • Understanding author guidelines
  • Formatting the manuscript to journal requirements
  • Preparing the cover letter
  • Understanding the journal-submission process
  • Introduction to research conferences and poster presentations

After the structured curriculum

The project may continue beyond week eight

Journal review timelines rarely follow a teaching calendar. ESMP therefore distinguishes the eight-week curriculum from the support that may be needed later.

Post-submission

Journal revision support

  • Understanding editor and reviewer comments
  • Preparing a point-by-point response letter
  • Revising the manuscript in response to reviewer feedback
  • Guidance for resubmission after a journal decision

Post-program

Extended mentorship

  • Continued guidance after the structured program
  • Assistance with analysis, interpretation, and manuscript-related questions
  • Peer-based community support and future research collaborations

Next cohort details coming soon

Develop the methods. Apply them to a real project.