Program overview

A structured mentorship built around one complete review

Across eight focused weeks, live online weekend teaching, weekday project work, and individualized guidance stay connected. Participants learn each method at the point it is needed in a real systematic review and meta-analysis.

View the Curriculum
Topic selection, protocol development, search and screening, extraction and appraisal, meta-analysis, and manuscript development connect to form one complete systematic review project. Focus a stage to emphasize its contribution, or focus the complete review to show every contributing stage.Topic & FeasibilityDefine the questionProtocolPlan the reviewSearch & ScreeningFind the evidenceExtraction & AppraisalEvaluate the studiesMeta-AnalysisSynthesize the resultsManuscriptCommunicate the researchONE COMPLETE REVIEW
  1. 01Topic & FeasibilityDefine the question
  2. 02ProtocolPlan the review
  3. 03Search & ScreeningFind the evidence
  4. 04Extraction & AppraisalEvaluate the studies
  5. 05Meta-AnalysisSynthesize the results
  6. 06ManuscriptCommunicate the research

THE ANCHOR PROJECT

ONE COMPLETE REVIEW

How the program works

Teaching and project work move together

Each week follows a deliberate cycle: understand the method, use it to make a research decision, and refine that decision through project-specific feedback.

The anchor project

Apply each stage to a real research project.

A feasible topic is provided at the start. Participants assess its novelty and feasibility, then develop the protocol, search, screening, extraction, appraisal, analysis, and manuscript as connected parts of the same research project.

Weekend

01

Live teaching

Methods are introduced, demonstrated, and discussed in live online weekend sessions, with time for questions and project-specific clarification.

Weekdays

02

Practical application

Participants apply the weekend teaching to the real review project, turning concepts into documented research decisions and outputs.

Throughout

03

Personalized mentorship

One-on-one guidance connects teaching with project work and responds to the methodological needs of the participant and project.

The eight-week pathway

Each week produces work the next week depends on

The sequence follows the natural research workflow, ending with manuscript finalization and submission preparation. Detailed objectives and practical tasks are available on the curriculum page.

  1. Week 1

    Introduction, Topic Selection & Feasibility

  2. Week 2

    Eligibility Criteria, Search Strategy & Study Protocol

  3. Week 3

    Literature Search & Screening

  4. Week 4

    Data Extraction & Risk of Bias Assessment

  5. Week 5

    Meta-Analysis in R

  6. Week 6

    Certainty of Evidence & Manuscript Writing

  7. Week 7

    Manuscript Writing & Formatting

  8. Week 8

    Finalization & Submission

Participation

Beginner-friendly

Who can join

Open to participants from any background. No prior research or meta-analysis experience is required.

What participation requires

Participants should be prepared for live weekend teaching and regular weekday project work throughout the program.

Ethical authorship

Contribution determines authorship

Participation alone does not establish authorship. The policy is based on recognized authorship criteria and the work each contributor actually performs.

  1. 01

    Enrollment does not automatically guarantee authorship or a particular author position.

  2. 02

    Authorship is based on substantive contribution and the ICMJE authorship criteria.

  3. 03

    Author order is determined by contribution and agreed among authors who meet the authorship criteria; no particular author position is guaranteed.

Mentorship beyond eight weeks

What happens after the structured program

The structured teaching phase concludes after eight weeks, but mentorship around the project can continue as needed. Participants may seek guidance on analysis, interpretation, manuscript refinement, and project-related questions that arise afterward, including guidance on responding to journal feedback where relevant.

Journal submission, correspondence, and revisions remain the responsibility of the research team.

Publication is not guaranteed. Editorial and publication decisions remain with the journal; the program provides methodological, writing, submission, and revision guidance.

Waitlist open

Explore the curriculum or join the waitlist.

View the Curriculum

Join the ESMP waitlist

Contact us to register your interest in the next cohort.